Teh Daily Squeak

Teh squeak c'est chic!

Friday, January 30, 2009

 

Deb Frisch Trial Notebook

DEBBIE BAITS POLICE, DA AT PUBLIC FORUM

Eugene (Jan 30)--When you're already in a hole, any rational person
would stop digging.

And then there's Debbie.

Video has surfaced of Frisch's unhinged appearance at a January 22
meeting of teh Eugene Police Auditor Ordinance Review Committee.
Her performance is only watchable by adding teh obvious LULZ:



So, at a time when Frisch faces criminal charges for harassment and
recklessly illegal use of mace, she continues to add to the ample
evidence of her recklessness.

As usual.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

 

Deb Frisch Trial Dept.


FRISCH FEARS CONSEQUENCES, REMOVES POSTS


DID LAWYER ORDER DEBBIE TO STFU?

Eugene (Jan. 29)--Frisch-watchers were amused to notice that, in
a Fearful Fit of FAIL, Little Debbie hurriedly removed various self-
incriminating posts on Jan. 27. The removals, of nearly a dozen posts,
occurred shortly before 8:00PM GST (Gerbil Standard Time).

Frisch removed posts which gave her truthless account of the evening
of Nov. 1-2 2008, for which Frisch has been hit with criminal charges.
A number of libelous posts also bit teh dust.

Frisch experts are equivocal in 'splaining Frisch's sudden failure of
nerve. "She might have sobered up and had a rare moment of
clarity," guessed one Dweebie Expert., who then LOLed. "But,
seriously, I wrote a dissertation on Frisch for my Tc.D. [doctorate in
teh cray zee]. But it's really a matter of speculation why she removes
the posts. Perhaps her public defender caught wind of Debbie's mental
breakages of wind, and told her to STFU, s'il vous plait."

"When it comes to why teh posts came down, anything's possible,"
reflected teh expert. "But one thing is certain: Frisch has never
grasped the concept that Teh Internet Is Forever. She still
doesn't realize that, the moment her posts hit teh 'net, they get
screen-capped and filed in teh olde 'evidence bucket.' Any
rational person would know this; but if Frisch were rational, she
wouldn't be Teh Deb."

"The posts she's forgotten will come back to bite her. Badly."

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

 

Deb Frisch Trial, 2009


DEBBIE FLASHES LAWYERS!!

NEW DEFENSE STRATEGERY SICKENS SCORES

Eugene (Jan. 27)--In what observers dubbed teh Worst Overshare
in History, Debbie Frisch showed more than a little leg to her public
defender--and teh DA prosecuting her case.

"I have enclosed a picture of the bruise on my thigh," Frisch wrote, in
a ham-handed attempt to tease teh lawyers.

"Also," Frisch fantasized, "there is a group of men who became sexually
obsessed with me...." (This, boys and girls, is what psychologists call
projection.)

A screencap of Frisch's ranting follows.


**WARNING: DEBBIE'S LEG APPEARS IN PHOTO.
NSFW! NSFSanity!**















































If Frisch thinks a little leg is all it takes to avoid criminal prosecution, then
she'd do well to re-evaluate her strategery--especially with legs like that!

An alert tipster also pointed out a deep puzzle...to wit, WHAT IN HECK is
Debbie donning for "underwear"?

Unable to solve teh conundrum, we finally consulted an intern for Perez
Hilton. He came through, God bless him! Teh U.S.U. (unidentified
sickening undergarment) in Frisch's photo bears an uncanny resemblance
to infantwear...



































And now, we close today's issue with a word from our sponsor...



Monday, January 26, 2009

 

Deb Frisch Trial 2009



FRISCH WAS ‘INEBRIATED’


LARGE POLICE, EMS RESPONSE ON NIGHT OF ASSAULT

A police officer detected that Deb Frisch was “inebriated” on the night
she assaulted her victim last November, sources say. Public records
also reveal that a substantial dispatch of Fire and EMS rescue teams
arrived at Frisch’s home that night—and were warned by police to stage
far from Frisch’s house.

Further details of the fateful evening are emerging, casting doubt
on any claim that Frisch was “justified” in her assault of a victim in
Frisch’s home nearly three months ago.

Frisch is facing charges of physical harassment, and unlawful discharge
of pepper spray, in connection with the attack. Last month, she declined
an offer to plead guilty in exchange for 5 years’ probation and 5 days
behind bars. “The only acceptable offer,” Frisch blogged today, quoting
a letter to her public defender, “is ‘both charges are dropped.’”


TEH EVENING IN QUESTION
The night of Nov. 1, 2008 began, obviously, with Debbie in a bar, called
the ‘John Henry.’ Aftertanking up, Frisch left the establishment at around
11:00pm.

Frisch was in no condition to drive, but seemed determined to try. The
victim, who had been friends with Frisch before the attack, confronted
Frisch outside. The victim relieved Frisch of her car keys—but not before
Frisch assaulted the victim in the tussle, according to the victim’s later
petition for a restraining order (with which Frisch was served last Dec. 5th).

Before long, Frisch was face-to-face with a police officer. “I do not
remember,” Frisch blogged, describing her blacked-out state, “all of the
details of what transpired in the 15 (30?) minutes between leaving the
bar and interacting withEugene Police Officer Judd [redacted].”

Unsurprisingly, the officer readily saw that Frisch was “inebriated.” Police
officers instructed the victim to drive Frisch’s smelly self home.

Upon arriving, Frisch thanked the friend for her favor—by pepper-spraying
her. The victim fled and contacted police, who arrived on the scene
between 1:30 and 2:00am.

Medical and rescue personnel were also summoned. One can imagine
Frisch’s condition, given the enormous response, as seen in EMS/Fire Logs
for that evening (Frisch's address has been redacted):



































(EPD police logs also indicate that rescue personnel were warned by the
Sheriff’s Office to “stag[e] well away from the scene.”)

After weighing the evening’s events, the Lane County District Attorney
arraigned Frisch on criminal charges on December 9.

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
Frisch’s compromised mental state on the night in question has legal
ramifications. She is charged, in part, under Oregon Revised Statute
163.212: it’s a class A misdemeanor to “recklessly discharges an electrical
stun gun, tear gas weapon, mace, tear gas, pepper mace or any similar
deleterious agent against another person.” The key adverb, of course, is
recklessly. Given Frisch’s inebriation and behavior—which was disturbing
enough to prompt a large-scale rescue response—it strains credulity that
Frisch’s actions that night were anything short of “reckless.” (Golly, as
loyal Squeak readers know, Frisch’s behavior is “reckless” even without
libation!)

Yet Frisch remains sufficiently self-deceived that she can avoid legal
consequences for her actions.
.
It’s enough to make one pity her poor public defender.

 





FRISCH HIT WITH RESTRAINING ORDER

Will Third Time Be Teh Charm?

Eugene, OR (Jan 26)--Deb Frisch received a restraining order
during the early afternoon of December 5, 2008, local public
records reveal.

"A person may obtain a Stalking Protective Order," explains
the website for teh Lane County Circuit Court, "if he/she or
a member of the immediate family or household has been the
subject of stalking and qualifies under Oregon law."

This is the third restraining order Frisch has received; she
received two restraining orders on behalf of other victims
in 2006. The Dec. 5 visit also adds to Frisch's ample
"experience" with security personnel and law enforcement:


Deb Frisch gets booted from University of
Oregon Campus in 2007 and 2008.


Saturday, January 24, 2009

 

Deb Frisch Trial 2009






FRISCH ADMITS PEPPER-SPRAYING VICTIM

TOLD LAWYER SHE WAS "EXCITED ABOUT GOING TO TRIAL"

Eugene, OR (Jan 23)--Facing charges of physical harassment
and illegal use of mace/pepper spray, Debbie confirmed that
she indeed used pepper spray on her victim in the case.

As usual, Frisch waved the victimhood banner, claiming that
the victim needed a spraying: "I allege that I believed I was
in imminent physical danger from the woman who had just
assaulted me," Frisch blogged on Friday.

One of the charges against Frisch involves Oregon Criminal
Law 163.212
, which makes it a class A misdemeanor "if the
person recklessly discharges an electrical stun gun, tear gas
weapon, mace, tear gas, pepper mace or any similar deleterious
agent against another person."


Frisch fantasized that the charges stemmed from her "work"
as an "activist." "I am disgusted," Frisch raved, "that the
Lane County District Attorney’s office is harassing me with
blatantly frivolous and fraudulent charges. I am stressed
and experiencing physical, emotional, social and other
damages as a result of this whistleblower harassment by
Alex Gardner, intended to punish me for exercising my
First Amendment rights in the past and inhibit my ability
to do so in the present and future."

Frisch's unhinged exercises of her "First Amendment rights"
are laughably well-known.

Frisch's blog appears below, with names of the victim and
officers redacted:








Thursday, January 22, 2009

 

DEB FRISCH TRIAL 2009






FRISCH CONFIRMS CHARGES,
REJECTS SETTLEMENT


"PROCEEDING AS IF THERE WILL BE A TRIAL"

Eugene, OR (Jan 22)--Facing charges of physical harassment
and illegal use of mace/pepper spray, Debbie blogged that she
rejected a settlement at a Lane County Criminal Court hearing
on Jan. 9.

"Since I rejected [the Deputy DA's] 'settlement offer,'" Debbie
wrote, "we are proceeding as if there will be a trial."

The revelation appeared in a personal blog (screencap below).

Frisch also took potshots at her former attorneys and victims.

(Frisch's past harassment caused her to be hit with an injunction
by a Denver civil court in 2007. She was arrested for stalking
and harassing another victim in 2006, for which Frisch received
a year's probation
. This followed Frisch's losing her job after
posting threatening comments online. [She remains
unemployed, for obvious reasons.] Frisch's behavior hasn't
improved.
)



Tuesday, January 20, 2009

 

Deborah Frisch: NEW ARREST, CHARGES




**EXCLUSIVE!** **TEH SQUEAK REPORT**

DEB FRISCH FACING NEW CRIMINAL CHARGES,
DOCUMENTS SHOW!!!1


CHARGES STEM FROM November 2nd Incident


"Unlawful ESG" appears to refer to "Unlawful [use of an] Electronic Stun Gun"

DEVELOPING...

Archives

September 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   June 2008   July 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   July 2011   October 2011   January 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   August 2012   September 2012   March 2014   April 2014   September 2014   February 2015   March 2015   April 2015   May 2015   June 2015   July 2015   August 2015   September 2015   November 2015   December 2015   October 2016   November 2016   December 2016   January 2017   February 2017   November 2017   December 2017  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]