CITY OF EUGENE FILES MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Eugene (May 28)--Teh lawyer for teh City of Eugene (and two police officers) filed a long-awaited Motion for Summary Judgment
against Deb Frisch's frivolous lawsuit on Friday.
In it, City of Eugene adduced ironclad facts and evidence, which show that Dummy Debbie lied her azz off in her
lawsuit against teh City. Specifically, City of Eugene (and EPD police officers) provided excerpts of transcripts from Deborah Frisch's criminal trial (March 4, 2009). These showed, overwhelmingly, that:
- Miss Debbie fully consented to allowing an acquaintance to drive Debbie's car home during Debbie's BIRFDAY MADNESS!! on November 1-2 2008. (In her lawsuit papers, Debbie lied that she had been "coerced" into allowing teh acquaintance drive Debbie home.)
- Miss Debbie THANKED both officers that night and even shook their hands (showing, again that Debbie's "coercion" claim was a bald-faced lie).
[FOR EXCERPTS FROM DEB FRISCH'S 3/12/09 CRIMINAL SENTENCING STATEMENT, CLICK HERE
After a year of LOLs, Debbie's frivolous lolsuit seems to be on its last rickety legs. Within teh next two weeks, Debbie will owe a reply to City of Eugene's Motion. Then, teh Magistrate Judge (and District Judge) can render their verdict. Teh smart money says that Debbie's lolsuit will soon be ass-booted out of court--just like teh court dismissed Frisch's complaints against City of Springfield
and Lane County
So, is this Teh Beginning of Teh End--
or just Teh End of Teh Beginning
? Even after Debbie's main lawsuit is nuked, a pair of straggling issues may call for further litigation:
- Pay Up Debbie, Part Deux? As teh lawsuit began last summer, counsel for City of Springfield and City of Eugene signaled their intent to make Debbie pay, BIG TIME, for legal re$ource$ expended to defend against Frisch's lying, groundless, frivolous lawsuit. In their answers filed in court, Defendants vowed to make Teh Deb pay for her abuse of teh legal process: "Defendants," wrote the attorney, "...are entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees as costs under 42 USC 1988 because [Teh Deb's] allegations against them are frivolous and wholly without merit."
even after Debbie's lawsuit is shown the trash-can, there still could be MONTHS of chances to point and laugh at Debbie Frisch, the poo-flinging monkey
Labels: deb frisch frivolous lawsuit